[CU for Wednesday 2 September 2009]
In his great “Generic Course” called “The State and Revolution”, Lenin spends the first five of the six existing chapters tracing the development of the thought of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels. The first Chapter takes from Engels’ “Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State”, and is quite general.
This is followed in the subsequent chapters by a rehearsal, or a revision, including quotations, of a number of landmark texts of Marx and Engels, in more detail.
In Chapter 2, Lenin sweeps through the period of bourgeois revolutions in mid-nineteenth-century
[The first picture represents Paris in February, 1848, and the second represents Berlin in March of that year]
Engels and Marx had good timing. Not only had Engels witnessed
Then they found themselves on the crest of the extraordinary revolutionary wave of1848, and were well-positioned to record it and to learn its lessons, as they were with later episodes, notably the Paris Commune of 1871.
In the first line of Chapter 2 Lenin describes “The Poverty of Philosophy” (together with the
Communist Manifesto) as “the first mature works of Marxism.” This book was written as a polemic against one of several anarchists (Pierre-Joseph Proudhin) that Marx had to contend with. These anarchists tested and tempered Marx’s resolve, in hard debate.
Lenin moves on to the Communist Manifesto, where he immediately derives the term “dictatorship of the proletariat” from the equally direct words of the Marx and Engels in the Manifesto, namely: “the state, i.e. the proletariat organised as the ruling class”.
“The state is a special organization of force: it is an organization of violence for the suppression of some class.”
The proletariat will use the state to suppress the bourgeois class.
Lenin then turns on the reformists. In Chapter 3 Lenin calls the anarchists and the petty-bourgeois opportunists “twin brothers”.
Here in Chapter 2 he writes:
“The petty-bourgeois democrats, those sham socialists who replaced the class struggle by dreams of class harmony, even pictured the socialist transformation in a dreamy fashion — not as the overthrow of the rule of the exploiting class, but as the peaceful submission of the minority to the majority which has become aware of its aims. This petty-bourgeois utopia, which is inseparable from the idea of the state being above classes, led in practice to the betrayal of the interests of the working classes.”
The chapter proceeds to touch “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte” (but not Marx’s other notable work of the time, “The Class Struggles in
Click on this link:
State and Revolution, Chapter 2, The Experience of 1848-1851, Lenin (4318 words)
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Post a Comment