Basics, Part 3a
Proletarians
and Communists
We only need one text for one
discussion per week, but the Communist University always gives alternatives,
which can also be used for supplementary reading. Yesterday we took the first
part of the Communist Manifesto. Here is the second
part, called Proletarians and
Communists.
As with the first part of
this highly-concentrated piece of writing, the simplest way to present it is
with selected quotes. Here are some:
The
Communists do not form a separate party opposed to the other working-class
parties.
They have no interests separate and apart from those
of the proletariat as a whole.
They do not set up any sectarian principles of their
own, by which to shape and mold the proletarian movement.
The Communists are distinguished from the other
working-class parties by this only:
(1) In the national struggles of the proletarians of
the different countries, they point out and bring to the front the common
interests of the entire proletariat, independently of all nationality.
(2) In the various stages of development which the
struggle of the working class against the bourgeoisie has to pass through, they
always and everywhere represent the interests of the movement as a whole.
The text then deals with
property, and with marriage, in similar terms to “The Origin of the
Family, Private Property and The State”, which was written 35 years
later. One of the remarkable things about the “Manifesto” is that it summarises
ideas which had not yet been published and knocked into shape by controversy,
yet it did so very accurately, and the Manifesto still stands tall today. On
ideas, and on the struggle of ideas, it says, among other things:
The ruling ideas of each age have ever been the ideas
of its ruling class.
When people speak of the ideas that revolutionize
society, they do but express that fact that within the old society the elements
of a new one have been created, and that the dissolution of the old ideas keeps
even pace with the dissolution of the old conditions of existence.
The history of all past society has consisted in the
development of class antagonisms, antagonisms that assumed different forms at
different epochs.
But whatever form they may have taken, one fact is
common to all past ages, viz., the exploitation of one part of society by the
other. No wonder, then, that the social consciousness of past ages, despite all
the multiplicity and variety it displays, moves within certain common forms, or
general ideas, which cannot completely vanish except with the total
disappearance of class antagonisms.
The communist revolution is the most radical rupture
with traditional relations; no wonder that its development involved the most
radical rupture with traditional ideas.
Finally, the Manifesto arrives, at the end of the second part, at the
following tremendous vision of communism as the purest possible kind of human
freedom:
Political power, properly so called, is merely the
organized power of one class for oppressing another. If the proletariat… by
means of a revolution, makes itself the ruling class, and, as such, sweeps away
by force the old conditions of production, then it will, along with these
conditions, have swept away the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms
and of classes generally, and will thereby have abolished its own supremacy as
a class.
In place of the old
bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an
association in which the free development of each is the condition for the free
development of all.
·
The above is to
introduce the original reading-text: Communist Manifesto,
Proletarians and Communists, Marx and Engels.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Post a Comment